Jury Reaches Verdict in Karen Read Trial After Hung Jury in First Trial

Must Read

THND Staff, June 18, 2025, 11:30 PM (ET)

The much-followed Karen Read trial ended Wednesday as jurors delivered their long-awaited verdict in Dedham, Massachusetts. This second criminal trial—following a mistrial in July 2024—brought renewed legal drama in the death of Boston police officer John O’Keefe during a 2022 blizzard.

Charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter while intoxicated, and leaving the scene, Read faced a jury of twelve people after a month of emotionally charged testimony. Prosecutors depicted a scorned and drunk Read who struck O’Keefe with her SUV, leaving him to die in the snow. They presented forensic and expert evidence to back their claims, while defense attorneys portrayed a schemed conspiracy. They argued no collision occurred, suggesting O’Keefe was beaten or attacked by a dog and then abandoned by others—but not by Read.

Karen Read in courtroom awaiting verdict
Karen Read reacts as the verdict is read in her retrial in Dedham, Massachusetts.

A key twist this time was that the lead investigator from the first trial was dismissed after sending derogatory messages about Read. The retrial also featured new attorneys on both sides. Defense counsel notably highlighted the alleged conspiracy and expert support arguing there was “no collision.” Prosecutors countered hotly, emphasizing eyewitness memories of Read saying, “I hit him,” and moments where she acknowledged potential impact in televised interviews.

Jurors debated for around 20 hours over four days, wrestling again with complex charges—especially manslaughter, which had stalled them the first time. Their verdict, unveiled today, could mean anything from full acquittal to conviction on all counts or even a partial ruling—leaving sentencing or further legal battles ahead.

Regardless, the conclusion of the Karen Read trial marks the end of a legal saga that captured public attention with its mixture of tragedy, corruption claims, and courtroom suspense. The community now awaits the judge’s next steps—whatever they may be.

Author

SUPPORT US

We are not putting our articles behind any paywall where you are asked to pay before you read an article. We are asking you to pay after you have read the article, if you are satisfied with the quality and our efforts.

However, this is not a donation. We are asking you to voluntarily pay for what you have already read or consumed. Please note that you will not be getting tax deductions as happens with donations. Additionally, we will pay taxes, as applicable, on what you contribute, because your payments are revenues for us.

Even a small amount that you decide to pay will strengthen our resources, and will help us sustain our operations. It costs us money to keep the website running, and we need your help to survive in this industry dominated and controlled by people who have no affinity for us.

With our belief and offered narrative being different from those of the mainstream media, we need to find a business model that is different from theirs, and this is one attempt, where your support is crucial. Thank you for your consideration.

Support Us

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz Clash Over Israel as Accusations of Anti-Semitism Erupt on Air

THND Staff, 11:45 PM, June 18, 2025 (EST) In a fiery exchange that lit up political circles, Tucker Carlson confronted...

More Articles Like This